Skip to main content

Cities for Kids and Bikes

 A common theme in my reflections has been the mixing of ages in public spaces and the abundance of children on bikes. In addition to safe bicycle infrastructure, Copenhagen has facilitated a city for kids through access to playgrounds, courtyards, parks, and a general whimsy in the city. The parks and playgrounds in Copenhagen were abundant and I found the concept of a manned/staffed playground really interesting. Dedicating staffing and money to playgrounds is a very foreign concept to me since child development and joy are not invested in the United States outside of the school system (and even then…). The traffic garden showed a deep care and investment in child joy and safety I found refreshing and inspiring. In addition to the various playgrounds I found, I also documented micro-playgrounds or places for play and playgrounds in more mature locations (such as museums). This showed how integrated children and their activities are into all aspects of Danish life. 



The Danish Architecture Center exhibit, So Danish, had this tiny doorway that said “Shortcut to the future”. The door was the size of a small child and I thought it was a sweet metaphor that the shortcut to the future could only be comfortably passed through by a child. The museum also had a playground on the side of it outside and a slide inside. Often times museums are not viewed as spaces for children, especially in the US. The incorporation of activities and places for children and adults in museums emphasizes my point about the acceptance of Children in public spaces in Denmark.


While getting to CopenHill I biked through the residential area of Freetown Christiana and noticed several small play structures and activities along the dual biking and pedestrian path. These, while run down, were easy to access and see from the residential homes. They were incredibly abundant along the path and I loved how they were all slightly different. I assume most of them were homemade and designed specifically for the needs and wants of children in the area. In addition to playing structures, bicycles strewn all over were abundant in the residential area of Christiana, several of them children's bikes. I enjoyed biking in Christiana, and I imagine it’s safe for children, due to the lack of cars and vehicles in the neighborhood. 


The traffic garden and the play structures in Christiana are two wildly different approaches to biking for kids and creating cities for kids. One is very structured and the other is unregulated and a tad wild. However, both achieve similar effects and create and integrate children into public spaces and prioritize sustainable transit and child joy in their community. 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aging and Biking

My final project focuses on the age demographics of biking and the overall influence of biking on public health and the effects of aging, particularly the social inclusion and accessibility of the elderly. I worked in a retirement home for 5 years, throughout high school and college, and access to the retirement home and surrounding areas was incredibly car-dependent. Many of the residents in my home could not drive because they had mobility issues, bad eyesight, or simply couldn’t afford to live in the home and their car. You may be wondering if they were not able to drive a car, how would bicycle infrastructure benefit them since they likely aren’t able to ride a bike either. That is a justified concern but through my observation of the places we’ve been, I’ve seen that sustainable bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure creates mobility and access for those in wheelchairs, walkers, and scooters. This is because there is enough space for these mobility devices on sidewalks or bike path...

Nebraska or Nijmegen?

I assume many people reading this blog have not been to Nebraska, or even Nijmegen, but if you’ve just been to Nijmegen (hi Marc and classmates!), just Nebraska (hi family!), or neither (hi friends from home!), you may not see the shocking similarities. The landscape, the smell, the geography, the weather, the number of cows, and more reminded me of Nebraskan summers. In an earlier blog, I stated that I thought more aspects of Danish bicycle design would be applicable to the US as opposed to Dutch design (which I objectively prefer, but thought Danish design was more suited for current American bicycle attitudes and urban design), however, Nijmegen changed my mind. Nijmegen is an example of a mid-sized city with medium-density levels. It is probably comparable to many American cities, especially cities geographically located within the Great Plains and Midwest. The before and after visuals of Nijmegen streets reminded me of American neighborhoods, showing that these transformations are...

He says with a musing voice, “Amsterdam, Amsterdam”

I LOVE AMSTERDAM! I love it so much I bought a shirt stating my love of Amsterdam. I’ve tried to understand why this city clicks for me, besides the incredible bicycle infrastructure of course. Mindy compared Amsterdam to an organism and I think this metaphor is one of the reasons it clicks for me. As someone with a significant biology and ecology academic background, this comparison helped me understand that within chaos, there is an organized and intentional flow, similar to a cell, organism, or ecosystem. The large overview may seem chaotic, but close up it’s organized and the relationships between people are key to this organized chaos. The best example of this was my favorite stop on Meredith’s PUMA exercise (a full debrief coming soon!). The intersection Alexandersplein was missing what I assumed was key safety infrastructure and traffic lights. However, while observing with Naomi I noticed that the relationships and silent communication between bikers, drivers, pedestrians, and ...