Skip to main content

Nebraska or Nijmegen?

I assume many people reading this blog have not been to Nebraska, or even Nijmegen, but if you’ve just been to Nijmegen (hi Marc and classmates!), just Nebraska (hi family!), or neither (hi friends from home!), you may not see the shocking similarities. The landscape, the smell, the geography, the weather, the number of cows, and more reminded me of Nebraskan summers. In an earlier blog, I stated that I thought more aspects of Danish bicycle design would be applicable to the US as opposed to Dutch design (which I objectively prefer, but thought Danish design was more suited for current American bicycle attitudes and urban design), however, Nijmegen changed my mind. Nijmegen is an example of a mid-sized city with medium-density levels. It is probably comparable to many American cities, especially cities geographically located within the Great Plains and Midwest. The before and after visuals of Nijmegen streets reminded me of American neighborhoods, showing that these transformations are possible. I knew this from my LiveMove work but seeing it in person and seeing how similar Nijmegen is to Nebraska, a state with a very limited amount of bicycle infrastructure, emphasized that the Dutch model can be applied to the US, and not just in West Coast and Northeast urban areas.

Sunset in Nijmegen

Sunset in Omaha



There are differences, of course, between Nijmegen and Nebraska, including historical background, ecosystem, size, HDI, and many other physical and cultural factors. The key difference I want to discuss, which should not come as a surprise, is the transit infrastructure and sustainability. Nebraska has an incredibly autofocused infrastructure and is designed for large vehicles like pickup trucks, trailers, tractors, and other farming equipment. I’ve always thought that bringing bicycle infrastructure to this area of the country would be impossible. Many people rely on their vehicles for their work and towns and resources are often miles apart. Seeing the infrastructure outside of Nijmegen showed me that bicycle infrastructure is not impossible. The ride to Lind was pleasant and safe with beautiful views, even when biking back along a shared car-bike road. While I do not expect bikes to replace the vehicles Nebraskans need for agriculture and longer distances, it would be a great option for travel around small towns, into town, and in between the network of small towns, that are often serviced via dirt roads. The dedication to preserving the natural landscape of the area by using dirt-colored asphalt for the road is just one of the aspects of transit design that I believe would make cycle infrastructure in states like Nebraska work. Below, I threw together a photoshopped rural Nebraskan road to one) emphasize the similarities I saw between it and Nijmegen and two) show that this change could be simple and inexpensive, and most of all possible!

Road in Primrose, Boone County, Nebraska (Population 61). Taken by Me in August 2022.



Reimagined road inspired by what I saw biking outside of Nijmegen.













Comments

  1. This is very awesome! I think you should make a short video - with renderings! - linking these two locations as I'm pretty sure nothing like this exists anywhere in the world. What a great rendering!!!!!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aging and Biking

My final project focuses on the age demographics of biking and the overall influence of biking on public health and the effects of aging, particularly the social inclusion and accessibility of the elderly. I worked in a retirement home for 5 years, throughout high school and college, and access to the retirement home and surrounding areas was incredibly car-dependent. Many of the residents in my home could not drive because they had mobility issues, bad eyesight, or simply couldn’t afford to live in the home and their car. You may be wondering if they were not able to drive a car, how would bicycle infrastructure benefit them since they likely aren’t able to ride a bike either. That is a justified concern but through my observation of the places we’ve been, I’ve seen that sustainable bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure creates mobility and access for those in wheelchairs, walkers, and scooters. This is because there is enough space for these mobility devices on sidewalks or bike path...

He says with a musing voice, “Amsterdam, Amsterdam”

I LOVE AMSTERDAM! I love it so much I bought a shirt stating my love of Amsterdam. I’ve tried to understand why this city clicks for me, besides the incredible bicycle infrastructure of course. Mindy compared Amsterdam to an organism and I think this metaphor is one of the reasons it clicks for me. As someone with a significant biology and ecology academic background, this comparison helped me understand that within chaos, there is an organized and intentional flow, similar to a cell, organism, or ecosystem. The large overview may seem chaotic, but close up it’s organized and the relationships between people are key to this organized chaos. The best example of this was my favorite stop on Meredith’s PUMA exercise (a full debrief coming soon!). The intersection Alexandersplein was missing what I assumed was key safety infrastructure and traffic lights. However, while observing with Naomi I noticed that the relationships and silent communication between bikers, drivers, pedestrians, and ...