Skip to main content

Ode to Museums

I am a huge fan of solo travel and typically travel by myself or with my family or a small group of friends. I’ve enjoyed traveling with our large group but it’s been an adjustment and it’s been helpful to take time for myself and take solo adventures. While in Copenhagen I visited the Jewish Museum and Glyptoteket by myself and used my bicycle as a means of transportation. Solo bicycling in a city where I was unfamiliar helped me adjust quickly to the customs and the routes in the areas I was in.

Both museums had a very in-depth architectural history. The attention to architecture, both interior and exterior in Denmark seemed significantly more than in the US. I noticed similar architectural patterns in Amsterdam, where my solo museum journey via bike continued. I went to the Anne Frank House with a group and the Van Gogh, the Portuguese Synagogue, and the Jewish Museum by myself. The architecture in Amsterdam is much more influenced by its medieval roots and existing infrastructure, particularly the Anne Frank House, the Portuguese Synagogue, and the Jewish Museum which are all in older buildings. 

I was not expecting to draw connections between this class and the museums I visited. My interests in museums are mostly impressionist and post-impressionist art and history which I struggled to connect to themes of sustainable transit. I was proved wrong, however. In the Glyptoteket they had old videos of people biking to the museum from the 1920s, just as I had done 100 years later. The Anne Frank Museum detailed the restrictions placed on Jews by the Nazi Occupation, including the banning of bicycle use. Motifs of bicycles and their use were present in all the museums I visited and emphasized the importance of access to transit and the historical relevance of bicycles, and the freedom they can provide. They allow people access to gorgeous art and culturally and historically significant exhibits, and they give children access to these things as well. This blog post is a bit unstructured (as intended) and sappy but my experiences biking to museums in Copenhagen and Amsterdam has been very significant in my understanding of the importance of sustainable transit.



Comments

  1. This is a really cool post and cool to have all these things happening at once - visiting museums, visiting museums as a way to get some solo time, visiting museums as an excuse to explore and familiarize the cities, and then the surprise of finding connections in some of the museum content and your lived experience in near real-time. Super cool.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

He says with a musing voice, “Amsterdam, Amsterdam”

I LOVE AMSTERDAM! I love it so much I bought a shirt stating my love of Amsterdam. I’ve tried to understand why this city clicks for me, besides the incredible bicycle infrastructure of course. Mindy compared Amsterdam to an organism and I think this metaphor is one of the reasons it clicks for me. As someone with a significant biology and ecology academic background, this comparison helped me understand that within chaos, there is an organized and intentional flow, similar to a cell, organism, or ecosystem. The large overview may seem chaotic, but close up it’s organized and the relationships between people are key to this organized chaos. The best example of this was my favorite stop on Meredith’s PUMA exercise (a full debrief coming soon!). The intersection Alexandersplein was missing what I assumed was key safety infrastructure and traffic lights. However, while observing with Naomi I noticed that the relationships and silent communication between bikers, drivers, pedestrians, and ...

Aging and Biking

My final project focuses on the age demographics of biking and the overall influence of biking on public health and the effects of aging, particularly the social inclusion and accessibility of the elderly. I worked in a retirement home for 5 years, throughout high school and college, and access to the retirement home and surrounding areas was incredibly car-dependent. Many of the residents in my home could not drive because they had mobility issues, bad eyesight, or simply couldn’t afford to live in the home and their car. You may be wondering if they were not able to drive a car, how would bicycle infrastructure benefit them since they likely aren’t able to ride a bike either. That is a justified concern but through my observation of the places we’ve been, I’ve seen that sustainable bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure creates mobility and access for those in wheelchairs, walkers, and scooters. This is because there is enough space for these mobility devices on sidewalks or bike path...

Biking in Malmö First Impressions

I was surprised by how different the biking infrastructure and experience was in Malmö. The vibe on the streets was significantly less busy then the Copenhagen streets but the infrastructure seemed comparatively underdeveloped in some parts. However, the pedestrian infrastructure was extremely developed and I noticed that, in the city center at least, people tended to park their bikes and traverse on foot even if bicycles were allowed in the area. One comparison I found interesting was the differing opinions between the intensity of drivers in Copenhagen vs Malmö. Cass found the Malmö drivers more intense and I found them tame compared to the Danish. I found people were generally more forgiving of small mistakes, such as stopping without putting your hand up, lingering in the crosswalk, or biking through a yellow. The bike lines are much more entangled than they are in Copenhagen, which is an aspect that I did not like. The intersection we stopped at before our last stop, with two...