Skip to main content

Biking in Malmö First Impressions

I was surprised by how different the biking infrastructure and experience was in Malmö. The vibe on the streets was significantly less busy then the Copenhagen streets but the infrastructure seemed comparatively underdeveloped in some parts. However, the pedestrian infrastructure was extremely developed and I noticed that, in the city center at least, people tended to park their bikes and traverse on foot even if bicycles were allowed in the area. One comparison I found interesting was the differing opinions between the intensity of drivers in Copenhagen vs Malmö. Cass found the Malmö drivers more intense and I found them tame compared to the Danish. I found people were generally more forgiving of small mistakes, such as stopping without putting your hand up, lingering in the crosswalk, or biking through a yellow. The bike lines are much more entangled than they are in Copenhagen, which is an aspect that I did not like.
The intersection we stopped at before our last stop, with two two-way bike lanes, a pedestrian lane, car lane, and a dual pedestrian and bicycle crosswalk seemed cluttered and difficult to use compared to Copenhagen. While I initially disliked the left turns in Copenhagen, I eventually got used to them and apreciated the uniformity in movement and how other bikers, cars, and pedestrians, were predictable in their movements. The intersection in Malmö forced pedestrians to cross over two roads of two-way bike traffic, with cyclists turning left or right in front of them. I had grown used to the single lane and direction bike lanes in Denmark and find them safer and easier to use in comparision. However, I did like how removed the bicycle lanes flet from the street in Malmö. I noticed many of them used a similar method to Eugene, placing parking in between the street and bicycle lanes, creating a buffer. I think a lot of difference I noticed, such as the intensity and amount of drivers (which I perceived as less then Copenhagen), are attributed to the decreased urbanism of Malmö. I believe that a lot of the infrastructure in Malmö is worth exploring in Eugene since they seem to have similar levels of population size and density, at least compared to Copenhagen. I am excited to explore Malmö infrastructure on my own today and further observe how people bike infrastructure.

Comments

  1. It's nice to be able to have the comparisons and to see how you process the differences and the experiences in each!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cities for Kids Part 2.

In my short time in Malmö, I have noticed significantly fewer playgrounds and spaces for children compared to Copenhagen. You’d think in a less dense city with more dedication to green space, there would be more playgrounds but alas. However, in my walking journey today for souvenirs, a raincoat, and chocolate, I wandered into an exhibit in a square called Dröm Torg (Dream Square). This empty square, half was taken up by a surface parking lot, featured art by children of what they imagined as their “Dream Square”. This exhibit showed squares filled with trees, flowers, bushes, playgrounds, and an occasional snake or clown. They’re was also a common theme of readily available ice cream near the square in the children's drawings. I really enjoyed this exhibit, and hope it is more than just an exhibit and actually comes to fruition. Not just engaging children with society through safe public spaces, but engaging them with the creation of the space, is a great way to incorporate them i...

Ode to Museums

I am a huge fan of solo travel and typically travel by myself or with my family or a small group of friends. I’ve enjoyed traveling with our large group but it’s been an adjustment and it’s been helpful to take time for myself and take solo adventures. While in Copenhagen I visited the Jewish Museum and Glyptoteket by myself and used my bicycle as a means of transportation. Solo bicycling in a city where I was unfamiliar helped me adjust quickly to the customs and the routes in the areas I was in. Both museums had a very in-depth architectural history. The attention to architecture, both interior and exterior in Denmark seemed significantly more than in the US. I noticed similar architectural patterns in Amsterdam, where my solo museum journey via bike continued. I went to the Anne Frank House with a group and the Van Gogh, the Portuguese Synagogue, and the Jewish Museum by myself. The architecture in Amsterdam is much more influenced by its medieval roots and existing infrastructure, ...

Cities for Kids and Bikes

  A common theme in my reflections has been the mixing of ages in public spaces and the abundance of children on bikes. In addition to safe bicycle infrastructure, Copenhagen has facilitated a city for kids through access to playgrounds, courtyards, parks, and a general whimsy in the city. The parks and playgrounds in Copenhagen were abundant and I found the concept of a manned/staffed playground really interesting. Dedicating staffing and money to playgrounds is a very foreign concept to me since child development and joy are not invested in the United States outside of the school system (and even then…). The traffic garden showed a deep care and investment in child joy and safety I found refreshing and inspiring. In addition to the various playgrounds I found, I also documented micro-playgrounds or places for play and playgrounds in more mature locations (such as museums). This showed how integrated children and their activities are into all aspects of Danish life.  The Dani...