I was surprised by how different the biking infrastructure and experience was in
Malmö. The vibe on the streets was significantly less busy then the Copenhagen
streets but the infrastructure seemed comparatively underdeveloped in some
parts. However, the pedestrian infrastructure was extremely developed and I
noticed that, in the city center at least, people tended to park their bikes and
traverse on foot even if bicycles were allowed in the area. One comparison I
found interesting was the differing opinions between the intensity of drivers in
Copenhagen vs Malmö. Cass found the Malmö drivers more intense and I found them
tame compared to the Danish. I found people were generally more forgiving of
small mistakes, such as stopping without putting your hand up, lingering in the
crosswalk, or biking through a yellow. The bike lines are much more entangled
than they are in Copenhagen, which is an aspect that I did not like.
The intersection we stopped at before our last stop, with two two-way bike
lanes, a pedestrian lane, car lane, and a dual pedestrian and bicycle crosswalk
seemed cluttered and difficult to use compared to Copenhagen. While I initially
disliked the left turns in Copenhagen, I eventually got used to them and
apreciated the uniformity in movement and how other bikers, cars, and
pedestrians, were predictable in their movements. The intersection in Malmö
forced pedestrians to cross over two roads of two-way bike traffic, with
cyclists turning left or right in front of them. I had grown used to the single
lane and direction bike lanes in Denmark and find them safer and easier to use
in comparision. However, I did like how removed the bicycle lanes flet from the
street in Malmö. I noticed many of them used a similar method to Eugene, placing
parking in between the street and bicycle lanes, creating a buffer. I think a
lot of difference I noticed, such as the intensity and amount of drivers (which
I perceived as less then Copenhagen), are attributed to the decreased urbanism
of Malmö. I believe that a lot of the infrastructure in Malmö is worth exploring
in Eugene since they seem to have similar levels of population size and density,
at least compared to Copenhagen. I am excited to explore Malmö infrastructure on
my own today and further observe how people bike infrastructure.
In my short time in Malmö, I have noticed significantly fewer playgrounds and spaces for children compared to Copenhagen. You’d think in a less dense city with more dedication to green space, there would be more playgrounds but alas. However, in my walking journey today for souvenirs, a raincoat, and chocolate, I wandered into an exhibit in a square called Dröm Torg (Dream Square). This empty square, half was taken up by a surface parking lot, featured art by children of what they imagined as their “Dream Square”. This exhibit showed squares filled with trees, flowers, bushes, playgrounds, and an occasional snake or clown. They’re was also a common theme of readily available ice cream near the square in the children's drawings. I really enjoyed this exhibit, and hope it is more than just an exhibit and actually comes to fruition. Not just engaging children with society through safe public spaces, but engaging them with the creation of the space, is a great way to incorporate them i...
It's nice to be able to have the comparisons and to see how you process the differences and the experiences in each!
ReplyDelete