Skip to main content

Biking in Malmö First Impressions

I was surprised by how different the biking infrastructure and experience was in Malmö. The vibe on the streets was significantly less busy then the Copenhagen streets but the infrastructure seemed comparatively underdeveloped in some parts. However, the pedestrian infrastructure was extremely developed and I noticed that, in the city center at least, people tended to park their bikes and traverse on foot even if bicycles were allowed in the area. One comparison I found interesting was the differing opinions between the intensity of drivers in Copenhagen vs Malmö. Cass found the Malmö drivers more intense and I found them tame compared to the Danish. I found people were generally more forgiving of small mistakes, such as stopping without putting your hand up, lingering in the crosswalk, or biking through a yellow. The bike lines are much more entangled than they are in Copenhagen, which is an aspect that I did not like.
The intersection we stopped at before our last stop, with two two-way bike lanes, a pedestrian lane, car lane, and a dual pedestrian and bicycle crosswalk seemed cluttered and difficult to use compared to Copenhagen. While I initially disliked the left turns in Copenhagen, I eventually got used to them and apreciated the uniformity in movement and how other bikers, cars, and pedestrians, were predictable in their movements. The intersection in Malmö forced pedestrians to cross over two roads of two-way bike traffic, with cyclists turning left or right in front of them. I had grown used to the single lane and direction bike lanes in Denmark and find them safer and easier to use in comparision. However, I did like how removed the bicycle lanes flet from the street in Malmö. I noticed many of them used a similar method to Eugene, placing parking in between the street and bicycle lanes, creating a buffer. I think a lot of difference I noticed, such as the intensity and amount of drivers (which I perceived as less then Copenhagen), are attributed to the decreased urbanism of Malmö. I believe that a lot of the infrastructure in Malmö is worth exploring in Eugene since they seem to have similar levels of population size and density, at least compared to Copenhagen. I am excited to explore Malmö infrastructure on my own today and further observe how people bike infrastructure.

Comments

  1. It's nice to be able to have the comparisons and to see how you process the differences and the experiences in each!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ode to Museums

I am a huge fan of solo travel and typically travel by myself or with my family or a small group of friends. I’ve enjoyed traveling with our large group but it’s been an adjustment and it’s been helpful to take time for myself and take solo adventures. While in Copenhagen I visited the Jewish Museum and Glyptoteket by myself and used my bicycle as a means of transportation. Solo bicycling in a city where I was unfamiliar helped me adjust quickly to the customs and the routes in the areas I was in. Both museums had a very in-depth architectural history. The attention to architecture, both interior and exterior in Denmark seemed significantly more than in the US. I noticed similar architectural patterns in Amsterdam, where my solo museum journey via bike continued. I went to the Anne Frank House with a group and the Van Gogh, the Portuguese Synagogue, and the Jewish Museum by myself. The architecture in Amsterdam is much more influenced by its medieval roots and existing infrastructure, ...

Nebraska or Nijmegen?

I assume many people reading this blog have not been to Nebraska, or even Nijmegen, but if you’ve just been to Nijmegen (hi Marc and classmates!), just Nebraska (hi family!), or neither (hi friends from home!), you may not see the shocking similarities. The landscape, the smell, the geography, the weather, the number of cows, and more reminded me of Nebraskan summers. In an earlier blog, I stated that I thought more aspects of Danish bicycle design would be applicable to the US as opposed to Dutch design (which I objectively prefer, but thought Danish design was more suited for current American bicycle attitudes and urban design), however, Nijmegen changed my mind. Nijmegen is an example of a mid-sized city with medium-density levels. It is probably comparable to many American cities, especially cities geographically located within the Great Plains and Midwest. The before and after visuals of Nijmegen streets reminded me of American neighborhoods, showing that these transformations are...

What do I hope to gain from this course?

This course has been on my radar since I was a freshman at the University of Oregon in 2019. It was one of the initial reasons I chose to become a PPPM major and I was incredibly excited to be able to take it. However, during the summer of my freshmen year and sophomore year, it was canceled due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Summer of my junior year I studied at the Oregon Institute of Marine Biology to fulfill biology requirements for my Environmental Science degree. This context led me to take this course in the Summer of 2023, leaving for  Copenhagen at 6am the day after I walked into Commencement. I’m excited to take this course as a senior who has fulfilled all the other requirements of my PPPM degree. I think it will build upon my knowledge of sustainable transit systems and open my eyes to what could be.  Bicycles parked near a metro station, Copenhagen. The primary things I hope to gain from this class are a more in-depth understanding of bicycle infrastructure, wh...