Skip to main content

Biking in Malmö First Impressions

I was surprised by how different the biking infrastructure and experience was in Malmö. The vibe on the streets was significantly less busy then the Copenhagen streets but the infrastructure seemed comparatively underdeveloped in some parts. However, the pedestrian infrastructure was extremely developed and I noticed that, in the city center at least, people tended to park their bikes and traverse on foot even if bicycles were allowed in the area. One comparison I found interesting was the differing opinions between the intensity of drivers in Copenhagen vs Malmö. Cass found the Malmö drivers more intense and I found them tame compared to the Danish. I found people were generally more forgiving of small mistakes, such as stopping without putting your hand up, lingering in the crosswalk, or biking through a yellow. The bike lines are much more entangled than they are in Copenhagen, which is an aspect that I did not like.
The intersection we stopped at before our last stop, with two two-way bike lanes, a pedestrian lane, car lane, and a dual pedestrian and bicycle crosswalk seemed cluttered and difficult to use compared to Copenhagen. While I initially disliked the left turns in Copenhagen, I eventually got used to them and apreciated the uniformity in movement and how other bikers, cars, and pedestrians, were predictable in their movements. The intersection in Malmö forced pedestrians to cross over two roads of two-way bike traffic, with cyclists turning left or right in front of them. I had grown used to the single lane and direction bike lanes in Denmark and find them safer and easier to use in comparision. However, I did like how removed the bicycle lanes flet from the street in Malmö. I noticed many of them used a similar method to Eugene, placing parking in between the street and bicycle lanes, creating a buffer. I think a lot of difference I noticed, such as the intensity and amount of drivers (which I perceived as less then Copenhagen), are attributed to the decreased urbanism of Malmö. I believe that a lot of the infrastructure in Malmö is worth exploring in Eugene since they seem to have similar levels of population size and density, at least compared to Copenhagen. I am excited to explore Malmö infrastructure on my own today and further observe how people bike infrastructure.

Comments

  1. It's nice to be able to have the comparisons and to see how you process the differences and the experiences in each!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

He says with a musing voice, “Amsterdam, Amsterdam”

I LOVE AMSTERDAM! I love it so much I bought a shirt stating my love of Amsterdam. I’ve tried to understand why this city clicks for me, besides the incredible bicycle infrastructure of course. Mindy compared Amsterdam to an organism and I think this metaphor is one of the reasons it clicks for me. As someone with a significant biology and ecology academic background, this comparison helped me understand that within chaos, there is an organized and intentional flow, similar to a cell, organism, or ecosystem. The large overview may seem chaotic, but close up it’s organized and the relationships between people are key to this organized chaos. The best example of this was my favorite stop on Meredith’s PUMA exercise (a full debrief coming soon!). The intersection Alexandersplein was missing what I assumed was key safety infrastructure and traffic lights. However, while observing with Naomi I noticed that the relationships and silent communication between bikers, drivers, pedestrians, and ...

Aging and Biking

My final project focuses on the age demographics of biking and the overall influence of biking on public health and the effects of aging, particularly the social inclusion and accessibility of the elderly. I worked in a retirement home for 5 years, throughout high school and college, and access to the retirement home and surrounding areas was incredibly car-dependent. Many of the residents in my home could not drive because they had mobility issues, bad eyesight, or simply couldn’t afford to live in the home and their car. You may be wondering if they were not able to drive a car, how would bicycle infrastructure benefit them since they likely aren’t able to ride a bike either. That is a justified concern but through my observation of the places we’ve been, I’ve seen that sustainable bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure creates mobility and access for those in wheelchairs, walkers, and scooters. This is because there is enough space for these mobility devices on sidewalks or bike path...

Netherlands vs Denmark (WHO WILL WIN?)

Showdown of the century! Which country has the best bicycle infrastructure?! The answer is finally here! And the winner is……… neither! Or, it depends. The systems have many similarities and differences and which one is better comes down to personal preference around infrastructure type and riding style. My observations regarding differences are Denmark More consistent infrastructure styles Stricter cycling rules and norms Danish left Blue route demarking More "organized" Less volume of cyclists More distinct routes The Netherlands Diverse types of bike infrastructure Dutch red Bicycles and pedestrians on the same grade More shared spaces between pedestrians and bicycles High volume traffic Infrastructure designed for bike volume at intersections The network seems more complete As Ronald pointed out, historical context is key when discussing the differences between infrastructure. Copenhagen had a huge fire, forcing them to rebuild, whereas Amsterdam has to work around increas...